tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28755195.post5030358277095763707..comments2023-09-25T04:26:51.568-06:00Comments on The Barefoot Bum: Better off without religionLarry Hamelinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08788697573946266404noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28755195.post-30030111523451564122007-03-29T04:57:00.000-06:002007-03-29T04:57:00.000-06:00BB--your guy Dawkins was on NPR's "Fresh Air" yest...BB--your guy Dawkins was on NPR's "Fresh Air" yesterday. Did you get a chance to hear him? He was very impressive: gracious, well-spoken, generous.The maidenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01158682036840381823noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28755195.post-81834406004826082612007-03-28T08:22:00.000-06:002007-03-28T08:22:00.000-06:00Heh. Nice economy of words. I imagine you slaved e...Heh. Nice economy of words. I imagine you <I>slaved</I> editing and sharpening your phrasing.<BR/><BR/>It's one of my favorite lines of thought.<BR/><BR/>..........<BR/><I> It might seem, then, that our need is for some genius to invent a new religion, a philosophy of life and a view of the world, that is plausible and generally acceptable for the late twentieth century, and through which every individual can feel that the world as a whole and his own life in particular have meaning. This, as history has shown repeatedly, is not enough. Religions are divisive and quarrelsome. They are a form of one-upmanship because they depend upon separating the "saved" from the "damned," the true believers from the heretics, the in-group from the out-group. Even religious liberals play the game of "we-re-more-tolerant-than-you."<BR/><BR/> Furthermore, as systems of doctrine, symbolism, and behavior, religions harden into institutions that must command loyalty, be defended and kept "pure,--and-because all belief is fervent hope, and thus a cover-up for doubt and uncertainty-religions must make converts.<BR/><BR/> The more people who agree with us, the less nagging insecurity about our position. In the end one is committed to being a Christian or a Buddhist come what may in the form of new knowledge. New and indigestible ideas have to be wangled into the religious tradition, however inconsistent with its original doctrines, so that the believer can still take his stand and assert, "I am first and foremost a follower of Christ/Mohammed/Buddha, or whomever."<BR/><BR/> Irrevocable commitment to any religion is not only intellectual suicide; it is positive unfaith because it closes the mind to any new vision of the world. Faith is, above all, open-ness --an act of trust in the unknown.</I><BR/><BR/>--Alan Watts, quoted in <A HREF="http://edgeing.blogspot.com/2007/02/end-of-beginning.html" REL="nofollow">The End Of The Beginning?</A><BR/>..........Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28755195.post-17957372863753234662007-03-28T07:37:00.000-06:002007-03-28T07:37:00.000-06:00Heh. I slaved all day over a hot keyboard for this...Heh. I slaved all day over a hot keyboard for this one.Larry Hamelinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08788697573946266404noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28755195.post-62206444634889795402007-03-28T07:21:00.000-06:002007-03-28T07:21:00.000-06:00Great post, Larry!Great post, Larry!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com