tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28755195.post6897829212280670158..comments2023-09-25T04:26:51.568-06:00Comments on The Barefoot Bum: Production and reproductionLarry Hamelinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08788697573946266404noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28755195.post-40602505707933819582017-07-18T07:48:52.436-06:002017-07-18T07:48:52.436-06:00Yeah, it makes more sense now. Thanks!Yeah, it makes more sense now. Thanks!Siggyhttp://freethoughtblogs.com/atrivialknotnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28755195.post-38429095154896273142017-07-18T03:46:55.108-06:002017-07-18T03:46:55.108-06:00Thanks, Siggy.
I have attempted to address the to...Thanks, Siggy.<br /><br />I have attempted to address the topic in more explicit detail: <a href="https://barefootbum.blogspot.com/2017/07/capitalist-reproduction.html" rel="nofollow">Capitalist reproduction</a>.<br /><br />HTHLarry Hamelinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08788697573946266404noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28755195.post-3388605084170548472017-07-16T11:07:41.190-06:002017-07-16T11:07:41.190-06:00When I think about driving, it seems like the prod...When I think about driving, it seems like the production/reproduction distinction can only be considered in relation to a particular good. If the good is transportation, then driving is production. But if the good is creating canned food, then driving is a form of reproduction as it allows workers to commute to the canning factory, where they perform the actual production.<br /><br />This isn't necessarily a problem, but if the goal is to distinguish between the mindset of those involved in production and those involved in reproduction, it raises the question, "In relation to which good?"<br /><br />I understand driving was just an analogy, but maybe you could comment on the analogous question in the Marxian analysis of capitalism.Siggyhttp://freethoughtblogs.com/atrivialknotnoreply@blogger.com