In no small part due to Phil Thrift's presentation on the Postmodern philosophy of Iranian mathematician Mohammad Sal Moslehian, I'm becoming more interested in Postmodernism as a genre. I haven't yet studied the genre extensively, but I have a few thoughts going in.
First, I'm confident that 90% of Postmodernist philosophy is crap. Not because I have anything against Postmodernism (quite the contrary), or even because I've read a ton of Postmodernist philosophy (which I haven't), or even that I've done some sort of statistical sampling. I am, however, a firm believer in Sturgeon's Law: 90% of everything is crap. The corollary is of course: "The existence of immense quantities of trash in [Postmodernist philosophy] is admitted and it is regrettable; but it is no more unnatural than the existence of trash anywhere."
It seems fairly obvious to me that in essence, just as Modernism was an attempt to justify the authority of our cultural, social, and philosophical systems, Postmodernism represents a general revolt against every kind of authority. "What're you rebelling against, Johnny?" "Whaddya got?"
Many--perhaps even most--of these rebellions are going to miss the mark. Some due to the incompetence of the attack, a few due to the solidity of the authority itself.
Raised in liberal, individualistic politics, outside of any organized religion, and proudly nurturing a lifelong addiction to science fiction, I'm a Postmodernist in this skeptical and rebellious sense to my very genes. I see most authority simply crumble if even the possibility of skepticism is admitted. And these authorities should crumble. What authority I do acknowledge--the authority of the scientific method, for instance--is not due to any dogmatism, but rather because I can see that these few authorities are strengthened by skeptical challenge.
Sunday, March 11, 2007
3 comments:
Please pick a handle or moniker for your comment. It's much easier to address someone by a name or pseudonym than simply "hey you". I have the option of requiring a "hard" identity, but I don't want to turn that on... yet.
With few exceptions, I will not respond or reply to anonymous comments, and I may delete them. I keep a copy of all comments; if you want the text of your comment to repost with something vaguely resembling an identity, email me.
No spam, pr0n, commercial advertising, insanity, lies, repetition or off-topic comments. Creationists, Global Warming deniers, anti-vaxers, Randians, and Libertarians are automatically presumed to be idiots; Christians and Muslims might get the benefit of the doubt, if I'm in a good mood.
See the Debate Flowchart for some basic rules.
Sourced factual corrections are always published and acknowledged.
I will respond or not respond to comments as the mood takes me. See my latest comment policy for details. I am not a pseudonomous-American: my real name is Larry.
Comments may be moderated from time to time. When I do moderate comments, anonymous comments are far more likely to be rejected.
I've already answered some typical comments.
I have jqMath enabled for the blog. If you have a dollar sign (\$) in your comment, put a \\ in front of it: \\\$, unless you want to include a formula in your comment.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I discovered that 90% of postmodernism was crap during my Dramatic Arts 1 class at UC Davis. It was all about performance art. After learning that my professor considered Stelarc a genius, I decided that art and postmodernism were... well, stupid.
ReplyDeleteBarefoot,
ReplyDeleteHere's something to check out:
Mathematics and the Roots of Postmodern Thought, Vladimir Tasic (review, amazon). It was recommended in Gregory Chaitin's book Meta Math.
(also, another mathematician, Zeilberger,'weighs in': The nonsense of attacks on 'postmodernism')
Much may be wrong with postmodern thought but 'modern' thought is wronger.
Phil:
ReplyDeleteMuch may be wrong with postmodern thought...
If Sturgeon's law is true (and I believe it is) then it is almost certain that much is wrong with postmodern thought, but we should not at all be surprised, and this failing is not necessarily due to postmodern thought.
Sturgeon's law entails that a statistical survey of any genre will always yield "crap" on average. It is necessary, I think, to evaluate any genre on the basis of the best work in that genre.
I'll put Tasic's book on my list. Thanks for the tip!