Thursday, April 26, 2007

We are well and truly fucked

Our democratic institutions have failed, and it's very important to understand that the most critical democratic institution, the free press, failed utterly before 9/11. If you don't believe me, see everything that Bob Somerby has written for the last six or seven years. Ignore his irritating style and frequent hobbyhorses; his documentation is impeccable and his conclusions inescapable. So it goes.

It only because of the tiniest weakness of Dick Cheney's will that we escaped blatant totalitarianism. Had he pushed just a bit harder, he could have quite easily implemented a totalitarian regime immediately after 9/11. Our political system does tend to promote those with weak character, but a sufficiently intelligent, ruthless person can find a way to rise. Our congress will not protect us, our courts will not protect us, our police and military will not protect us, and our press will not protect us. So it goes.

Arthur Silber correctly identifies the root of our national flaws in the character of our citizens. It is not just our misogyny and homophobia (in the literal sense: the irrational fear of being homosexual or being thought of as homosexual), but our thoroughly martial, violent character, hardly surprising for a nation conceived in slavery, grown in genocide, and marked since by ceaseless aggression and intervention. It is no excuse that the rest of the world, historically, has been no better. So it goes.

Silber's analysis is correct, but I think his suggested remedies are—with all due respect for a man I admire tremendously—naive.

Blogging, advertising, voting, writing one's "representatives" and demonstrating are completely ineffective. No actions of the tiny minority of the population both capable of sophisticated abstract thought and possessed of a truly universal humanistic ethic can overcome the propaganda of the now unified commercial mass media and the mass movements of fascist Dominionism and Christianism, and the absolute power of the wealthy elite. As Tim Kreider so eloquently states:
History has shown that [protests] accomplished jack shit. Protests are an obsolete tactic, routine and impotent now, and the media renders them invisible by pretending they never happened, anyway. Letters to our elected representatives have the same effect on public policy as prayers to Jesus do on cancer.
Or as Kurt Vonnegut has Harrison Starr put it, "Why not write an anti-glacier book?" (An ironic metaphor given global warming.) We can vote all we want, but our elected representatives know that they are answerable not to us, but to those who fund their campaigns and who, with a word to Maureen Dowd and Chris Matthews, will with lies and bullshit eviscerate any candidate who might even think about compromising their absolute power. So it goes.

The economic elite has decided to abandon any notion of ethical and economic progress in favor of mindlessly raping our national economy and our global environment, and offhandedly killing not only our own sons and daughters but any sufficiently weak brown people available to violently demonstrate our "manhood". The rapine and slaughter is so pointless (how many billions of dollars can a person usefully spend?) that the inescapable conclusion is that the economic elite, possessed of virtually unlimited power, has found that this power has not made them happy, has not assuaged the neuroses and pain which drove them to become powerful and wealthy. They are thus savagely taking revenge on the world that has so wronged them by making them rich. And perhaps we—especially we Americans—deserve such retribution: It was we ourselves who made these twisted and desperately unhappy people wealthy beyond the dreams of Croesus. So it goes.

There's no hope of restoring our country's greatness: We have never been great in any moral sense, only violently powerful. There's no hope of establishing any greatness, or even moderating our intrinsic evil. Not only our economic overlords but the nation itself is too powerful, almost absolutely powerful. And it is inevitable, inescapable that power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

The only hope to which a thoughtful, humanistic American can reasonably aspire is to work for a more graceful degradation, to insure that, as we slowly destroy ourselves, we do not take the rest of the world with us in a nuclear holocaust, and that we retain a shred of national dignity (as did Great Britain) and not devolve into chaos and kleptocracy (as did Russia).

It is inevitable that millions, perhaps hundreds of millions, of people are going to die, both in the pointless wars squabbling over first the remaining oil and then later the remaining unpolluted fresh water. Hundreds of millions more will live in desperate misery, displaced by these wars and by the consequences of the inevitable global warming. It is logically and physically possible to prevent such immense tragedy, but it is politically impossible to do so. This is the best case. The worst case is that all of humanity, and perhaps all life on Earth, dies in a nuclear holocaust. So it goes.

You can either live with the inevitability of this tragedy or you can't. If you can't, your only alternative to setting yourself on fire on the steps of the White House is to live in a big city. Reside in New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago, etc. (or any large city in any country); you will probably die sooner rather than later, or, at best, live as a miserable refugee. There is no better way of escaping moral culpability for an enormous tragedy than to be among its victims.

If you can live with this tragedy—even if you don't approve of it, but you might as well disapprove of earthquakes—then start looking for a way out. Just moving to a third-world country will not help, though. They're going to be just as fucked as anyone else, perhaps more so, and as not only a non-citizen but guilty by association of wars and global warming, you'll be the last to receive any charity.

Don't bother learning Chinese, or Arabic, or Hindi. The Islamic states are already screwed, and China and India will have at best only a fleeting moment as superpowers before they're overwhelmed by global warming and their own regional wars.

There are some things we can do to soften the decline of America and the world. Possibly the most important is to keep up the challenge against the Islamists, Christianists and Dominionists. Members of these mass movements, and any political leaders beholden to them, are the most likely, given their apocalyptic theologies, to simply nuke the world just for the fun of it. We must not only pressure these fanatics directly, but challenge and encourage the religious moderates to pressure them—it is only by means of persuading religious moderates that these fanatic mass movements can become a real threat to the survival of humanity.

Vote Democratic. The Democratic party is a creature of the economic elite just as is the Republican party. There is, however, a dialectical struggle within that elite, between the Republicans, who want to destroy the country as quickly as possible, and the Democrats, who want to destroy it more slowly. We're fucked either way, but the Democrats will at least sweet talk us and use more lube. The Democrats are also not nearly as beholden to and infiltrated by the Christianists as are the Republicans.

Write. We marginalized bloggers are not going to change the world, we're not even going to stop the obviously insane war in Iraq or prevent the next one in Iran, but at some point, after everything collapses, people will be looking for new ideas and ideologies. History is littered with unemployed, marginal bums (e.g. Marx) whose ideas later shaped civilization. We can at least bestow our ideas on the future.

In the meantime, live as your conscience dictates, and don't be afraid to live well and happy. We are all snowflakes in the avalanche. The best of us have no more objective right than the worst to impose our ideal of civilization on the unwilling masses. We can merely act as we will, live as we will, speak as we will and let the chips fall where they may. So it goes.


  1. Well, we can always hold out hope that a small group of secular humanists (atheists) scientists and others can leave the planet and colonize another one, forming a society based on rationality and freedom - you know, the one we used to think we had here.

    This is just depressing.

  2. I have a sinking feeling that I'd end up on the spaceship with the telephone sanitizers.

  3. Oh BB. Back to venting. What happended to that pleasant Humean nihilism? War is great--and profitable, and chicks dig it too. That's an entailment of, er, Mr. MESR.

  4. I see that Perezoso has ceased having anything substantive or interesting to say.

    I can't say I share your pessimism of the larger picture, but I agree that there is certainly cause for alarm. Personally, I'm hoping for a nice, unifying threat, like zombies.

  5. Oh, love. You're wrong about America, you know. There are things about this country that are truly great. Secularism? The rule of law? Equality of people? You can't appreciate the last unless you've lived in a classist society. In America, classes exist to a degree, of course, but it's so mild, it's almost unnoticeable. They're reemerging, but for a long while, people WERE equal, unlike in England or in most Asian countries.

    Think of the diversity that America has accomplished -- no other country on earth is this diverse.

    The accountability of the government has not (historicaly) routinely absolutely failed.

    The standard of living is something to be proud of, even if we have managed to destroy earth in the process -- but that was going to happen eventually anyway, and humans' collective foresight is never very good.

    Write off humans. Write off the world. But don't say there is nothing or was nothing great about this country. It's been the most innovative, the most daring, the most wildly successful experiment in human history. That's an achievement, even if we all die (but then, we all die anyway, so what's to cry about?)

  6. Yes pointing out the implications of moral subjectivism might bore the sentimental, the naive or irrational, Mssr. Elliott. NO moral facts moral facts. Thus---War rules!. And indeed that is a time-honored tradition, one that say Ezra Pound was well aware of--as was RA Heinlein. The ends justifies the means is a perfectly legitimate POV, especially when the other side plays by those rules. Walmarts, or Hooters, in Baghdad--or Riyadh-- pronto. Yass.

  7. "...Republicans, who want to destroy the country as quickly as possible, and the Democrats, who want to destroy it more slowly."

    Focusing on just that statement for a moment...

    Do you honestly think that it is true? Few right-wing, theocratic talking points are as blatantly absurd as "Liberals hate America and are wanting to undermine and destroy it."

    We do no better when we similarly accuse in the opposite direction. In my view, right-wingers have an unhealthy and overdeveloped sense of nationalism and patriotism. The last thing they want is to actually *destroy* America.

    I agreed with and enjoyed your essay overall, but that one comment is obviously not right.


  8. Brian: I'm referring specifically to the Democratic party; even more specifically to the high-level party officials and elected politicians (with a few exceptions, such as Feingold and Kucinich).

    I don't think these people have anything whatsoever to do with liberalism, progressivism or actual liberals, except to pay us a little lip service as they sell our our economy and democracy to cement the absolute power of the insanely enraged plutocracy.

  9. I still strenuously disagree though.

    Even though I have become more cynical about politics the more educated I have become about it, statements like that still seem to go way too far.

    I will not press the point though. The post was a good one, and I do not want to detract from it with a minor quibble.


  10. Brian: You might be right. I have darker and lighter days; yesterday I was feeling pretty fucking gloomy.

    In any event, I'm glad you liked the post.

  11. This is a late entry, but I just wanted to add that I hope you have had a nice day since. The world sucks a lot of the time, but we sometimes can manage to have fun in it anyway. :)



Please pick a handle or moniker for your comment. It's much easier to address someone by a name or pseudonym than simply "hey you". I have the option of requiring a "hard" identity, but I don't want to turn that on... yet.

With few exceptions, I will not respond or reply to anonymous comments, and I may delete them. I keep a copy of all comments; if you want the text of your comment to repost with something vaguely resembling an identity, email me.

No spam, pr0n, commercial advertising, insanity, lies, repetition or off-topic comments. Creationists, Global Warming deniers, anti-vaxers, Randians, and Libertarians are automatically presumed to be idiots; Christians and Muslims might get the benefit of the doubt, if I'm in a good mood.

See the Debate Flowchart for some basic rules.

Sourced factual corrections are always published and acknowledged.

I will respond or not respond to comments as the mood takes me. See my latest comment policy for details. I am not a pseudonomous-American: my real name is Larry.

Comments may be moderated from time to time. When I do moderate comments, anonymous comments are far more likely to be rejected.

I've already answered some typical comments.

I have jqMath enabled for the blog. If you have a dollar sign (\$) in your comment, put a \\ in front of it: \\\$, unless you want to include a formula in your comment.