Tuesday, February 02, 2010

Exposure to luxury can alter decision making

Exposure to luxury can alter decision making:
The mere exposure to luxury goods can have a corrosive effect on decision-making that pushes individuals to put their interests over the interests of others [individual interest at the expense of others' over mutual self-interest], according to a Harvard Business School study. ...

The students who viewed luxury goods were significantly more likely than the second group to endorse production of a new car that might pollute the environment, launch a new software with bugs, or market a video game that might induce violence, according to the study.

We can therefore plausibly expect people who enjoy actual luxury to have even less concern about the well-being of others. As octogalore puts it: "[T]he fact that things are this way is horribly, despicably unfair. And maybe so. But that’s how reality works..." God forbid we should actually take responsibility for correcting unfairness (unless that unfairness affects us personally).

I've got mine, Jack, go fuck yourself.


  1. Ah yes, the "reality" pushers. It's just reality that my son born in the US expects a life a thousand times better than a child born in Haiti. It is, um, written. An ungovernable rule of the universe, like gravity. Conveniently not to be argued against. Reality! they cry.

    I never underestimate the power of wanting nice stuff. It is fucking heroin, wanting nice stuff.

  2. So does this mean I'm gonna have to trade in my fucking Bentley when I'm your Commissar of Science?

  3. Dude, if you have a fucking Bentley, you're not going to survive to become Commissar of Science. And if you don't fucking give me a ride, I'll do the job myself.


Please pick a handle or moniker for your comment. It's much easier to address someone by a name or pseudonym than simply "hey you". I have the option of requiring a "hard" identity, but I don't want to turn that on... yet.

With few exceptions, I will not respond or reply to anonymous comments, and I may delete them. I keep a copy of all comments; if you want the text of your comment to repost with something vaguely resembling an identity, email me.

No spam, pr0n, commercial advertising, insanity, lies, repetition or off-topic comments. Creationists, Global Warming deniers, anti-vaxers, Randians, and Libertarians are automatically presumed to be idiots; Christians and Muslims might get the benefit of the doubt, if I'm in a good mood.

See the Debate Flowchart for some basic rules.

Sourced factual corrections are always published and acknowledged.

I will respond or not respond to comments as the mood takes me. See my latest comment policy for details. I am not a pseudonomous-American: my real name is Larry.

Comments may be moderated from time to time. When I do moderate comments, anonymous comments are far more likely to be rejected.

I've already answered some typical comments.

I have jqMath enabled for the blog. If you have a dollar sign (\$) in your comment, put a \\ in front of it: \\\$, unless you want to include a formula in your comment.