Sunday, August 16, 2015
2 comments:
Please pick a handle or moniker for your comment. It's much easier to address someone by a name or pseudonym than simply "hey you". I have the option of requiring a "hard" identity, but I don't want to turn that on... yet.
With few exceptions, I will not respond or reply to anonymous comments, and I may delete them. I keep a copy of all comments; if you want the text of your comment to repost with something vaguely resembling an identity, email me.
No spam, pr0n, commercial advertising, insanity, lies, repetition or off-topic comments. Creationists, Global Warming deniers, anti-vaxers, Randians, and Libertarians are automatically presumed to be idiots; Christians and Muslims might get the benefit of the doubt, if I'm in a good mood.
See the Debate Flowchart for some basic rules.
Sourced factual corrections are always published and acknowledged.
I will respond or not respond to comments as the mood takes me. See my latest comment policy for details. I am not a pseudonomous-American: my real name is Larry.
Comments may be moderated from time to time. When I do moderate comments, anonymous comments are far more likely to be rejected.
I've already answered some typical comments.
I have jqMath enabled for the blog. If you have a dollar sign (\$) in your comment, put a \\ in front of it: \\\$, unless you want to include a formula in your comment.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
These ethic problems are a lot easier to solve than presented by most people. Ethics are just morals which are determined by the individual. Ethics (morals) are not the same as illegal. Stealing for family may be ethical but the law will throw you in jail. So to her stealing is OK but now the jury must judge.
ReplyDeleteThe truffles & Champagne is wrong because it has no food value.
Also what is stealing? According to the buyBull, it is perfectly OK to steal. If you enter a man's field and eat all they can but cannot removed any.
And the trolley stuff is really silly as there are so many things wrong with it. Just 5 questions makes you the observer look stupid and you should mind your own business.
Zach is a humorist first and a philosopher second. Still, the question at the end is at least provocative.
Delete