Thursday, January 17, 2008

Best of the Blogosphere

Vatican Condemns Harry Potter: I won't spoil Jared's excellent quip. Go read it for yourself.

Order and chaos in chess:
Is chess ultimately governed by fixed rules and logic, or is it just a ‘random’ game? A comparison with science. ...

Sure, we have many practical rules of thumb (”put rooks on an open file, develop your pieces, etc.”) but because they don’t always work, they’re not real formulas, like E=mc^2 or V=(4/3)*pi*(r^3). Are such formulas in principe possible in chess, even though they may look entirely different? Is chess ultimately a game of order, or a game of chaos? What do you believe?

3 comments:

  1. Tiredatwork1/18/08, 2:28 AM

    Chess I my opinion is a boring game. It is lauded as a game of strategy and intellectual combat. What a load of bull crap. It is a memory game, pure and simple. am...ok..when he does that I'm supposed to do......oh yeah that! Golly I'm a great chess player!

    I know that is a little off topic but the reputation of chess as a stategy game has always bugged me.
    As to whether or not mathematical equations can be applied to it, I'm not so sure. I am certain the game could be described by a mathematical formula. The number of states a chess board can attain is finite. With finite states and ridig change rules, it should be possible to describe all that mathematically (not that I would have a notion of how to go about that) I can't see and randomness in chess. Maybe I'm missing the point. It friday, I was up late, I don't like chess and I'm stuck at work....so sue me.

    Chess.....what a mega boring game.

    Have you got a great memory? Want to pretend you can think.....CHESS!!!! Ok i'll stop now.

    Sorry for trowing a wobbler on you blog larry.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Chess is not really my game (I play Go and Poker), but it really does show the chaos lurking in purely deterministic, totally non-random systems.

    ReplyDelete

Please pick a handle or moniker for your comment. It's much easier to address someone by a name or pseudonym than simply "hey you". I have the option of requiring a "hard" identity, but I don't want to turn that on... yet.

With few exceptions, I will not respond or reply to anonymous comments, and I may delete them. I keep a copy of all comments; if you want the text of your comment to repost with something vaguely resembling an identity, email me.

No spam, pr0n, commercial advertising, insanity, lies, repetition or off-topic comments. Creationists, Global Warming deniers, anti-vaxers, Randians, and Libertarians are automatically presumed to be idiots; Christians and Muslims might get the benefit of the doubt, if I'm in a good mood.

See the Debate Flowchart for some basic rules.

Sourced factual corrections are always published and acknowledged.

I will respond or not respond to comments as the mood takes me. See my latest comment policy for details. I am not a pseudonomous-American: my real name is Larry.

Comments may be moderated from time to time. When I do moderate comments, anonymous comments are far more likely to be rejected.

I've already answered some typical comments.

I have jqMath enabled for the blog. If you have a dollar sign (\$) in your comment, put a \\ in front of it: \\\$, unless you want to include a formula in your comment.