Sunday, September 02, 2007


Wikileaks is developing an uncensorable Wikipedia for untraceable mass document leaking and participatory analysis. Our primary interests are oppressive regimes in Asia, the former Soviet bloc, Sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East, but we expect to be of assistance to peoples of all countries who wish to reveal unethical behavior in their governments and corporations. We aim for maximum political impact; this means our interface is identical to Wikipedia and usable by non-technical people. We have received over 1.2 million documents so far from dissident communities and anonymous sources...
More about Wikileaks here

(h/t to Black Sun Journal)


  1. It all sounds so noble doesn't it?

    It also sounds like a wonderfully safe anonymous vehicle do a hatchet job on someone.

    Frought with dangers I shouldn't wonder.

  2. Dangerous perhaps. But who wants to be safe? You're just as much opposed to the Nanny State as I am.

  3. I had more in mind the little man living in a less enlightened country or society where rumour alone might prove harmful if not fatal.

    It's possible I am seeing pitfalls where there are non but it is still within living memory where denunciation by a neighbour resulted in a trip to the concentration camp or the gulag.

    Are we not witnessing internees at gitmo standing accused by "unknowns" on secret uncorroborated "evidence." and the same unknown accusers never having to face the scrutiny of a courtroom.

    A different scenario I will grant you but the principle is the same.


Please pick a handle or moniker for your comment. It's much easier to address someone by a name or pseudonym than simply "hey you". I have the option of requiring a "hard" identity, but I don't want to turn that on... yet.

With few exceptions, I will not respond or reply to anonymous comments, and I may delete them. I keep a copy of all comments; if you want the text of your comment to repost with something vaguely resembling an identity, email me.

No spam, pr0n, commercial advertising, insanity, lies, repetition or off-topic comments. Creationists, Global Warming deniers, anti-vaxers, Randians, and Libertarians are automatically presumed to be idiots; Christians and Muslims might get the benefit of the doubt, if I'm in a good mood.

See the Debate Flowchart for some basic rules.

Sourced factual corrections are always published and acknowledged.

I will respond or not respond to comments as the mood takes me. See my latest comment policy for details. I am not a pseudonomous-American: my real name is Larry.

Comments may be moderated from time to time. When I do moderate comments, anonymous comments are far more likely to be rejected.

I've already answered some typical comments.

I have jqMath enabled for the blog. If you have a dollar sign (\$) in your comment, put a \\ in front of it: \\\$, unless you want to include a formula in your comment.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.