Sunday, April 01, 2007

The Democrats grow a spine!

... and it's a good one. I didn't think they had it in them.

I'm copying the whole article, copyright lawyers be damned. If anyone complains, I'll modify the post tomorrow.

House Judiciary Passes Article of Impeachment Against President Bush
WASHINGTON – The first article of impeachment against President George W. Bush was passed by the House Judiciary Committee in an emergency special session late Saturday. The article appears to have been prompted by new evidence that the FBI had abused its power under the direction of the president, who had blocked further investigations into the matter. Each of the thirty nine members of the committee seemingly voted along party lines on the measure, which passed by a vote of 22-17.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers Jr. (D-Mich.) has issued a statement on the allegations being brought forth; though a full disclosure on the charges of "high crimes and misdemeanors" against the president will be made available to the public during a Monday press conference scheduled at 11AM EST.

The charge is based on new information of an action taken by the President in July of last year to block a Justice Department investigation into warrantless surveillance, which the committee statement referred to as ""an unprecedented move by the White House to intervene with an investigation by the Office of Professional Responsibility." The OPR was then forced to abandon its investigation as security clearances were refused by the president.

As the vote appears to have been timed to coincide with Congress's Easter recess over the next two weeks, committee members have failed to return calls requesting comment.

Justice Department Inspector General Glenn Fine found 48 violations of law during 2003-2005 in the bureau's use of National Security Letters (NSL) to acquire telephone, e-mail, and financial records of Americans and foreigners without court approval. Citing abuses to Patriot Act provisions, FISA statutes, and the Fourth Amendment, the document will charge President Bush with obstruction of justice pertaining to a Congressional investigation regarding the authorization of the domestic spying program.

A quote attributed to Committee Chairman Conyers in the press statement reads, "For 32 years the OPR had conducted highly sensitive investigations involving Executive Branch programs, and had not once been denied access to information classified at the highest levels of government." Chairman Conyers continued, "Recent testimony from FBI officials have led this committee to believe that illegal acts were in fact taking place for over two years as President Bush abused his power to obstruct an investigation into those very acts."

The Senate is currently in the midst of a showdown with the White House over executive privilege and access to cabinet members regarding testimony on the recent firings of eight United States Attorneys. Saturday's vote comes at a crucial juncture. Critical to that investigation is the inconsistency of previous statements made by Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, who is scheduled to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee following the Easter recess.

Criticizing the administration's use of executive privilege and describing the failure to uphold accountability as an abuse of power, Democrats speaking on condition of anonymity predict that an additional article may be put forth by the committee to warrant that Vice President Dick Cheney and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice be removed from office. Following articles will be voted on by the House Judiciary Committee before they are debated on the House floor. The first article is expected to win a majority vote in the House, which would bring the charges against the president to the Senate.
(h/t to Indigent A-hole)

Update: April Fools!


  1. Your numbers are off - a party line vote would be 21-16. Also, a political reporter would not likely feel the need to add "seemingly" in front of party line vote.

    Otherwise, I'll give it a 5 on the April Fool's Day 1-10 scale.

  2. Anything with an April 1 date (or Jason Leopold's byline) demands independent verification - and I ain't finding any.

  3. This has made it all the way to Largest Minority through several other blogs. I was way taken. It was fun while it lasted! Good job.

  4. "seemingly"...that sucks, you're right. Not as easy as it looks.

    The Drudge-child porn one on KOS had me going for a couple minutes.


Please pick a handle or moniker for your comment. It's much easier to address someone by a name or pseudonym than simply "hey you". I have the option of requiring a "hard" identity, but I don't want to turn that on... yet.

With few exceptions, I will not respond or reply to anonymous comments, and I may delete them. I keep a copy of all comments; if you want the text of your comment to repost with something vaguely resembling an identity, email me.

No spam, pr0n, commercial advertising, insanity, lies, repetition or off-topic comments. Creationists, Global Warming deniers, anti-vaxers, Randians, and Libertarians are automatically presumed to be idiots; Christians and Muslims might get the benefit of the doubt, if I'm in a good mood.

See the Debate Flowchart for some basic rules.

Sourced factual corrections are always published and acknowledged.

I will respond or not respond to comments as the mood takes me. See my latest comment policy for details. I am not a pseudonomous-American: my real name is Larry.

Comments may be moderated from time to time. When I do moderate comments, anonymous comments are far more likely to be rejected.

I've already answered some typical comments.

I have jqMath enabled for the blog. If you have a dollar sign (\$) in your comment, put a \\ in front of it: \\\$, unless you want to include a formula in your comment.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.