[T]he superstition that the budget must be balanced at all times, once it is debunked, takes away one of the bulwarks that every society must have against expenditure out of control. . . . [O]ne of the functions of old-fashioned religion was to scare people by sometimes what might be regarded as myths into behaving in a way that long-run civilized life requires.
Saturday, September 20, 2008
Atheism and atrocity
Spoiler: "No. Don't be ridiculous."
[h/t to John W. Loftus]
7 comments:
Please pick a handle or moniker for your comment. It's much easier to address someone by a name or pseudonym than simply "hey you". I have the option of requiring a "hard" identity, but I don't want to turn that on... yet.
With few exceptions, I will not respond or reply to anonymous comments, and I may delete them. I keep a copy of all comments; if you want the text of your comment to repost with something vaguely resembling an identity, email me.
No spam, pr0n, commercial advertising, insanity, lies, repetition or off-topic comments. Creationists, Global Warming deniers, anti-vaxers, Randians, and Libertarians are automatically presumed to be idiots; Christians and Muslims might get the benefit of the doubt, if I'm in a good mood.
See the Debate Flowchart for some basic rules.
Sourced factual corrections are always published and acknowledged.
I will respond or not respond to comments as the mood takes me. See my latest comment policy for details. I am not a pseudonomous-American: my real name is Larry.
Comments may be moderated from time to time. When I do moderate comments, anonymous comments are far more likely to be rejected.
I've already answered some typical comments.
I have jqMath enabled for the blog. If you have a dollar sign (\$) in your comment, put a \\ in front of it: \\\$, unless you want to include a formula in your comment.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
Thanks for the link - I tried to write something similar concerning the Dinesh D’Souza article mentioned in that post, so I enjoyed reading a more competent answer!
ReplyDeleteIt should be noted that the author of said article (which voices some strange ideas about communism) is a devout libertarian.
ReplyDeletethe author ... is a devout libertarian
ReplyDeleteIndeed. I'm not universally endorsing every concept expressed in the article. His analysis of the lack of connection between atheism and communism, however, seems well argued and substantiated by the facts.
Greetings, I'm the author of the article you've kindly linked to. I'm interested in any and all feedback, including these "strange ideas about communism" I may have :). I'm always open to correction.
ReplyDeleteRobert, the article addresses only atheism in any detail. It's definitely the case that your opinions about Marx's and other notable communists' attitude about religion is in agreement with my own studies of the subject as well as my own personal attitudes.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous mentions your "strange ideas about communism;" I myself see too little detail in this particular piece to offer serious criticism. Furthermore, such ideas seem peripheral to the main point, and any commentary would seem uncharitable quibbling.
I've subscribed to your blog, so if you write specifically and at greater length about your historical and philosophical ideas regarding communism, I will be sure to read it, and I will proffer my honest (if sometimes less than temperate) response.
Thanks Barefoot. I don't write a whole lot on communism nowadays, but comments on my article have spurred another idea about a possible connection between it and religion. It seems to me both also promise a utopian future, which gives people hope and motivates them to levels of effort they would not otherwise achieve. The Soviet Union had some impressive "firsts," which cannot be explained as the result of a fear-driven populace.
ReplyDeleteThe Soviet Union had some impressive "firsts"..."
ReplyDeleteAs did Communist China.