[Luke Muehlhauser] mistakenly thinks that atheists can defend evolution on empirical grounds, but that is simply untrue. Consider the origins of life. There are concrete empirically-based objections to all atheistic scenarios and the process of science has only shown that even the simplest living cells are vastly more complex than we realized. Thus atheists are the ones who retreat into the murky realms of philosophy by arguing that I.D. is not science, and by ignoring the demarcation problem. Yet another case of atheism being undermined by modern scholarship.
Monday, August 16, 2010
The Stupid! It Burns! (murky philosohical edition)
The Real Reason Atheists Always Lose Debates: