Wednesday, September 22, 2010

Science fiction

Science Fiction is a Genre That Everyone Should Read

Science fiction authors are rarely great stylists. "A lot of the best known science fiction looks either dated (Jules Verne, HG Wells) or dumb: the platitudinous and banal ‘philosophical’ discussions of the Star Trek crew on their pointless and endless galactic cruise."

The value of science fiction is neither stylistic or strictly scientific; its value is truly literary, in the highest sense.
It is fiction that asks questions about the human condition and the meaning of life by taking us beyond everyday life. We go to strange planets, far distant futures or even to our own past — in order to learn about who we really are. Science fiction takes its readers to far off galaxies in order to help them understand life on earth more clearly — just as Dorothy traveled to Oz to learn what Kansas was really all about. The results can be startling and profound...
(via toomanytribbles)

4 comments:

  1. Have you read Blindsight by Peter Watts?

    http://www.rifters.com/real/Blindsight.htm

    In my opinion, the best science fiction novel of the past decade.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Couldn't agree more. Much of today's science fiction is literary fiction; ie Dan Simmons Hyperion series.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Almost all the questions that got me to thinking about morality and man's interactions with the world were from the SciFi masters who asked what if? It was in a SciFi book that I finally read about Incest...Why is it bad? Is it bad? Is it OK in certain ways?
    I NEVER had that discussion in religious class or biology or philosophy only in a SciFi book was there someone with courage to ask the questions on many topics.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It was in a SciFi book that I finally read about Incest...

    Most of Heinlein's later works have strong themes of incest.

    You might also be thinking of Theodore Sturgeon's anvilicious 1967 short story, If All Men Were Brothers, Would You Let One Marry Your Sister?, which appeared in Dangerous Visions.

    ReplyDelete

Please pick a handle or moniker for your comment. It's much easier to address someone by a name or pseudonym than simply "hey you". I have the option of requiring a "hard" identity, but I don't want to turn that on... yet.

With few exceptions, I will not respond or reply to anonymous comments, and I may delete them. I keep a copy of all comments; if you want the text of your comment to repost with something vaguely resembling an identity, email me.

No spam, pr0n, commercial advertising, insanity, lies, repetition or off-topic comments. Creationists, Global Warming deniers, anti-vaxers, Randians, and Libertarians are automatically presumed to be idiots; Christians and Muslims might get the benefit of the doubt, if I'm in a good mood.

See the Debate Flowchart for some basic rules.

Sourced factual corrections are always published and acknowledged.

I will respond or not respond to comments as the mood takes me. See my latest comment policy for details. I am not a pseudonomous-American: my real name is Larry.

Comments may be moderated from time to time. When I do moderate comments, anonymous comments are far more likely to be rejected.

I've already answered some typical comments.

I have jqMath enabled for the blog. If you have a dollar sign (\$) in your comment, put a \\ in front of it: \\\$, unless you want to include a formula in your comment.