Friday, January 07, 2011

Incisive criticism

craniorectal inversion Awwww.... poor Stan is all butthurt that I think he's an idiot. Debate and incisive criticism are just not possible for someone who shows such an advanced case of cranio-rectal inversion. Show a modicum of intellectual honesty and a minimal degree of argumentative competence, and maybe someone might actually take you seriously. I'm not holding my breath, though.
Asserting “non-belief” in a deity is superficial; it indicates that an answer which is convenient to the Atheist has been chosen without thought, or possibly it has been chosen to cover for the Atheist inability to prove his belief, which is that there is no deity. But the cover story is false, and the Atheist, who fails this cover is forced to see that his belief is an unprovable statement of faith, not a rational, empirical, scientific finding.

This is it, Stan. All you've got is just fallacy after fallacy: straw men, equivocations, excluded middle, argument by etymology, poisoning the well, ad hominem arguments, etc., ad nauseam. You demand depth, but you fail to offer anything but error, and only the most superficial of errors. You do not deserve debate; you deserve only scorn and derision.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please pick a handle or moniker for your comment. It's much easier to address someone by a name or pseudonym than simply "hey you". I have the option of requiring a "hard" identity, but I don't want to turn that on... yet.

With few exceptions, I will not respond or reply to anonymous comments, and I may delete them. I keep a copy of all comments; if you want the text of your comment to repost with something vaguely resembling an identity, email me.

No spam, pr0n, commercial advertising, insanity, lies, repetition or off-topic comments. Creationists, Global Warming deniers, anti-vaxers, Randians, and Libertarians are automatically presumed to be idiots; Christians and Muslims might get the benefit of the doubt, if I'm in a good mood.

See the Debate Flowchart for some basic rules.

Sourced factual corrections are always published and acknowledged.

I will respond or not respond to comments as the mood takes me. See my latest comment policy for details. I am not a pseudonomous-American: my real name is Larry.

Comments may be moderated from time to time. When I do moderate comments, anonymous comments are far more likely to be rejected.

I've already answered some typical comments.

I have jqMath enabled for the blog. If you have a dollar sign (\$) in your comment, put a \\ in front of it: \\\$, unless you want to include a formula in your comment.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.