Sunday, June 21, 2009

Not a lapsed fucktard

Suzanne may be a lapsed atheist, but she's certainly a member in good standing of the fucktard community.

Newsflash: atheists really are smarter than theists, at least generally. There really is a Dominionist movement (not a conspiracy, it's out in the open) to establish a Christian theocracy. Religion, especially Christianity, really is a crutch for dupes.

But the recto-cranial inversion gets worse: "'[T]heocracy' [to which atheists object] means ANY laws inspired by Christianity even if people of other religions (and none) can and do agree with them." Why would we object to laws we can agree with? And it's a blatantly fucktarded contradiction to say we object to laws we actually do agree with.

"As if there could be no rational, reason-based arguments to support these things [traditional marriage, and protect for the unborn]." Sure there are: it is an actual fact that many people hate gay people, and hating someone is a reason [not a reason I generally approve of, but a reason nonetheless] to oppress people. This is a perfectly legitimate reason-based argument in a democracy, but I wonder if Suzanne wants to explicitly make that argument. Other than that, however, the supposedly "rational, reason-based" arguments against gay marriage and abortion rights are ridiculously stupid.


  1. Suzanne, *sigh*. Proof that fundidiocy does not stop at the border. We are so proud.

  2. Larry,

    I really wouldn't worry so much about Christian Dominionism. Not likely to happen.


  3. I'm sure George Tiller, those killed on 9/11, those killed in Oklahoma city, Matthew Shepard, the millions of women losing their reproductive rights, the thousands of people tortured by the Bush administration, the people of Iraq and Afghanistan will take much comfort in your charming and quaint optimism.

    In other words: You're a fucktard. Piss off.

  4. That's right sister, get to the back of the secular bus.


Please pick a handle or moniker for your comment. It's much easier to address someone by a name or pseudonym than simply "hey you". I have the option of requiring a "hard" identity, but I don't want to turn that on... yet.

With few exceptions, I will not respond or reply to anonymous comments, and I may delete them. I keep a copy of all comments; if you want the text of your comment to repost with something vaguely resembling an identity, email me.

No spam, pr0n, commercial advertising, insanity, lies, repetition or off-topic comments. Creationists, Global Warming deniers, anti-vaxers, Randians, and Libertarians are automatically presumed to be idiots; Christians and Muslims might get the benefit of the doubt, if I'm in a good mood.

See the Debate Flowchart for some basic rules.

Sourced factual corrections are always published and acknowledged.

I will respond or not respond to comments as the mood takes me. See my latest comment policy for details. I am not a pseudonomous-American: my real name is Larry.

Comments may be moderated from time to time. When I do moderate comments, anonymous comments are far more likely to be rejected.

I've already answered some typical comments.

I have jqMath enabled for the blog. If you have a dollar sign (\$) in your comment, put a \\ in front of it: \\\$, unless you want to include a formula in your comment.