Friday, June 12, 2009

Tolerance and contempt

I think most people would not find it odd that I have complete contempt for racism and racists. My contempt is not eliminationist: I don't want racists to die, but I do demand that they change. My contempt is complete not in that I think racists are completely bad, but that I'm simply unwilling to accept, tolerate or accommodate any excuses whatsoever. Were you raised from birth to be a racist? Damn tough for you to change, I get it, but too bad: you have to change, and it's your fundamentally responsibility to find a way. What am I supposed to say? "Oh, you were raised by fucked up white supremacists, so it's okay for you to hate black people." Hardly.

My contempt for religion is on a par with my contempt for racism. Religion is just as wrong as racism, and for the same sorts of reasons: religion, like racism, depends on false assertions about the world of objective reality, and religion, like racism, is fundamentally harmful to others. I realize we live in a religious culture, just as people a hundred years ago lived in a racist culture, but that doesn't make religion any more acceptable or tolerable now than it made racism tolerable then. I realize that it's hard for some people to adopt a skeptical, realistic attitude towards the world, but too bad: you have to change, and it's your responsibility to change.

No one ever changed his views because those views were tolerated or accommodated by his community, society and culture. The only way I can even try to influence your views is by expressing my contempt for some and my approval of others. It's not very effective on an individual level, but when the contempt starts to permeate the entire society, things do change. We haven't eliminated racism, misogyny, anti-semitism and other such evils of opinion, but we have definitely made them far less socially acceptable and far more marginalized. And we have done so not by accommodating these views, but by expressing our contempt, disdain and ridicule, and by refusing excuses or evasions.

Religion is like racism a choice, a choice driven not by honest intellectual or scientific study, not by personal talent and inclination, but entirely by moral and ethical opinion. If you can move around in the world, you can think skeptically and scientifically, to the extent that you choose to do so. If you do not, in one area of thought or many, the failure is not of ability to be corrected by education, but rather a moral failure, to be corrected by contempt.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please pick a handle or moniker for your comment. It's much easier to address someone by a name or pseudonym than simply "hey you". I have the option of requiring a "hard" identity, but I don't want to turn that on... yet.

With few exceptions, I will not respond or reply to anonymous comments, and I may delete them. I keep a copy of all comments; if you want the text of your comment to repost with something vaguely resembling an identity, email me.

No spam, pr0n, commercial advertising, insanity, lies, repetition or off-topic comments. Creationists, Global Warming deniers, anti-vaxers, Randians, and Libertarians are automatically presumed to be idiots; Christians and Muslims might get the benefit of the doubt, if I'm in a good mood.

See the Debate Flowchart for some basic rules.

Sourced factual corrections are always published and acknowledged.

I will respond or not respond to comments as the mood takes me. See my latest comment policy for details. I am not a pseudonomous-American: my real name is Larry.

Comments may be moderated from time to time. When I do moderate comments, anonymous comments are far more likely to be rejected.

I've already answered some typical comments.

I have jqMath enabled for the blog. If you have a dollar sign (\$) in your comment, put a \\ in front of it: \\\$, unless you want to include a formula in your comment.